December 19, 2025

Welcome!

It is our last SuperVision issue of the year! We are covering a wide variety of topics in this edition, including a look back at 2025 and a look forward to 2026, AI and its impact on hiring, the recent status of disparate impact claims, immigration, joint employer issues, and the impact of legislation passed in Virginia in July 2025.

 

A sincere thank you to everyone who read our publication this year. As we plan for 2026, please let us know any changes you might want to see. Do you have topics we should address? A change in the format? Please feel free to email us with all thoughts and suggestions.

 

2026 National Labor & Employment Law Symposium, February 1, 2026, Steamboat Springs, Colorado

 

Do you like to ski and learn about the law? If so, please plan to join a gathering of top labor and employment lawyers for the latest legal updates in a close-knit, collegial atmosphere. More than a dozen sessions, in a roundtable format, will cover cutting-edge labor and employment topics. In between sessions, participants will have plenty of time to enjoy skiing in Steamboat Springs or networking. Click here to learn more.

 

Congratulations!

 

We are very pleased to announce that Spilman’s own Gerald M. Titus III has been appointed by Governor Patrick Morrisey to serve on the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, filling the vacancy created by the tragic passing of Justice Tim Armstead. Michael J. Basile, Spilman’s Managing Member, said it best:

 

"Governor Morrisey could not have selected a more capable or principled individual. Gerald has been an indispensable member of our firm for many years. His legal acumen, judgment, and character make him exceptionally well-suited for this role, and we are immensely proud to see him reach this milestone in his career."

 

Click here to learn more.

 

Additionally, David D. Amsbary, a partner in our Huntington office and valuable member of Spilman’s labor and employment team, was appointed by Governor Morrisey to serve as Judge on the Sixth Judicial Circuit in Cabell County following the retirement of Judge Paul T. Farrell in October. Click here to learn more.

 

We are always thankful to those of you who support this publication. We wish you all Happy Holidays and a Happy New Year!

 

Thank you for reading.


Eric W. Iskra, Member in Charge of Lawyer Administration; Chair, Labor and Employment Practice Group; Chair-Elect, ABA Labor and Employment Law Section



Carrie H. Grundmann, Member; Chair, Energy Law Practice Group; Executive Editor, SuperVision

Lookback for 2025 and Look Forward to 2026 

By Carrie H. Grundmann


As we close out 2025 and look to 2026, I surveyed some of my fellow partners in the labor and employment group and asked them to answer two questions:


  1.   What was the biggest issue facing employers in 2025?
  2.   Can you offer a prediction on the biggest issue employers will face in 2026?


Click here to read the entire article.

Recruiting Scams Using AI-Generated Applicants and Credentials Provide New Reasons for Employers to Update Recruiting Processes

By Mitchell J. Rhein

 

The President of the United States poses with a lightsaber flanked by the American flag and eagles. Taylor Swift offers free cookware sets due to a packaging error. Ukraine’s former Foreign Minister calls a United States Senator to gather political information. While no one was fooled into believing President Trump owns a lightsaber, scammers are using AI-generated photos, videos, or voices to trick people into providing confidential or sensitive information. These schemes now target employers seeking to hire for remote jobs.

 

In January, the FBI warned that North Koreans were posing as candidates for remote jobs to access employers’ confidential information and systems. Nearly every major company has hired or received applications from North Koreans using AI-generated interview answers or deepfake applicants to participate in video interviews. According to the Financial Times, one quarter of all job applicants in the global market will be fake by 2028.

 

To avoid falling prey to these scams, hiring managers do not need a computer science degree from Stanford. 


Click here to read the entire article.

Disparate Impact: The Law of the Land?

By Peter R. Rich and Carrie H. Grundmann

 

Disparate impact is a long-standing theory of liability recognized under laws like Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and many state employment laws. First recognized by the United States Supreme Court in 1971 in Griggs v. Duke Power Co., the Supreme Court held that facially neutral employment practices can violate Title VII where they disproportionately exclude protected groups unless the employer can show the practices are job-related and consistent with business necessity. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 431–36 (1971). Disparate impact claims are assessed by courts under the burden-shifting framework known as the “effects test." 


Click here to read the entire article.

Executive Actions on Immigration Impacting Employers

By Emily R. Merritt


Since taking office earlier this year, President Trump has signed a flurry of executive orders, many of which greatly impact employment-related issues for employers. For example, Executive Order 14159, “Protecting the American People Against Invasion,” stepped up the enforcement of immigration laws through the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Critically, however, there have not been any new immigration laws executed under the Trump administration. Instead, E.O. 14159 operates under the authority of existing immigration law, the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1302. Under this Executive Order, immigrants who do not comply with the Act’s registration requirements could receive civil penalties, be removed from the United States, or be detained.


Click here to read the entire article.

The Joint Employer Roller Coaster Crests Another Hill

By Eric E. Kinder

 

The last several federal administrations have gone back and forth regarding how to define a joint employer under federal law and specifically under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). For the uninitiated, a joint employer exists where two separately incorporated entities are treated as a single employer with respect to an employee or group of employees. Joint employers are jointly and severally liable for FLSA compliance, including any wages, damages and penalties owed to the employees. Importantly, this can be true even where the two entities are, by outward appearances, separate.


Click here to read the entire article.

Virginia Code § 8.01-42.6 Expands Potential Liability of Employers

By Julian F. Harf

 

A Virginia law that took effect on July 1, 2025, has expanded the potential liability of employers in certain personal injury and wrongful death actions. Under Virginia’s traditional standard for vicarious liability, an employer could only be held liable for the tortious acts of its employee if the employee acted within the scope of employment. Virginia Code § 8.01-42.6 changes the landscape. The law provides a mechanism to hold employers liable for their employees’ tortious acts under certain circumstances involving “vulnerable victims,” regardless of whether the tortious conduct arose while the employee was performing a job-related service for the employer.

 

Click here to read the entire article.

X Share This Email
LinkedIn Share This Email
This is an attorney advertisement. Your receipt and/or use of this material does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between you and Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC or any attorney associated with the firm. This e-mail publication is distributed with the understanding that the author, publisher and distributor are not rendering legal or other professional advice on specific facts or matters and, accordingly, assume no liability whatsoever in connection with its use.

Responsible Attorney: Eric W. Iskra, 800-967-8251